Dec. 13, 2021 Edition
“Her intuition was her favorite superpower.” – Jess Keys;
fashion blogger
Last month, we stressed the importance of keeping an open
mind and digging a little deeper when we see the opportunity. This strategy typically points us in the
right direction, but sometimes we are left to primarily follow our
intuition. Most folks would probably
admit that their gut feel has led them down more than one prosperous path (more
on this later).
Like usual, the questions from area farm producers have been
numerous. Therefore, I’ll try to hit the
most common topics in brief fashion and in no particular order: fertilizer price concerns, sunflower yields, weather
outlook, and corn diseases.
Fertilizer
Prices Continue Upward
A few years back, a large farm manager in the region told
me, “I’m going to wait until the end of June or even July 1st to
purchase and apply urea for the corn.
Prices should come down by then!”
He was right, unfortunately!
Fertilizer prices did come down after the spring rush, but the
unfortunate part was that so much yield potential was lost on his corn crop
that any savings in fertilizer was more than off-set with lower productivity.
Obviously, we’re not losing any yield potential at this time
of year by waiting to see what develops for fertilizer prices. However, one should think about what
parameters will have to change and change significantly enough to get the
desired outcome of downward fertilizer price movement by spring. As you begin to analyze infrastructure
capabilities, trucking logistics, importing demands, shipping parameters, etc.,
it becomes a tangled web to try and accurately predict how the 2022 year my
unfold in regard to ag fertilizer availability and price.
Ag-commodity production, in some regard, is a game of
hunches and we need to have the confidence to follow our hunches and doing all
we can to insure input supplies for the upcoming season.
https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2021/11/world-fertilizer-prices-continue-to-soar...
https://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---41167.htm
Corn
Disease - Tar Spot
·
In 2018, tar spot (Phyllachora maydis)
established itself as a foliar fungus of economic concern for corn production
in the Midwest, with severe outbreaks affecting corn yield in several states –
up to 40 bu/ac yield loss in certain locations
·
Tar Spot gets its name from the fungal
fruiting bodies it produces on corn leaves that look like spots of tar,
developing black oval or circular lesions on the corn leaf
·
Tar Spot is favored by cool temperatures
(60-70 ºF), high relative humidity (>75%), frequent cloudy days, and 7+
hours of dew at night, and overwinters on residue
· Hybrid selection should be a primary consideration in managing for tar spot. Commercial corn hybrids vary widely in their susceptibility
https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/diseases-tar-spot.html
https://corteva.showpad.biz/webapp2/results?query=tar&scope=content...
https://corteva.showpad.biz/webapp2/content/channels/...
Corn
Residue Breakdown
One of the big challenges in our northern latitudes with
corn production is managing the high volume of corn residue after harvest. Iowa State University Extension summarized an
excellent three-year study looking at management practices that could most
likely influence the rate of corn residue breakdown or decomposition – tillage and
applied nitrogen. A few interesting
tidbits were determined:
· The tillage systems analyzed were deep tillage,
strip-tillage, and no-till. There was
also analysis of Bt corn hybrids versus non-Bt hybrids across tillage
treatments as well (however, no corn borer infestation numbers were mentioned)
· Residue decomposition was measured by CO2-C
release for the tillage/Bt portion of the experiment
· There were no significant differences in the amount
of CO2-C released based on tillage system or Bt presence
· Nitrogen as 32% UAN was applied at three
different rates – 0, 30, and 60 lbs N/ac – to corn residue immediately after
harvest
· Pre-measured amounts of residue were placed in
nylon mesh bags prior to the nitrogen applications for evaluation over the next
12 months with measurements taken every three months
· Results highlighted the fact that it takes
temperature as well as soil moisture to stimulate microbial activity for the
breakdown of crop residue. Only after the
nine-month evaluation did the nitrogen treatments begin to differentiate with
the higher nitrogen rate revealing higher residue breakdown rates – albeit below
the statistical evaluation criteria (treatments were not statistically different
even at the 12-month time frame).
https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2019/11/corn-residue-breakdown...tillage-and-n...
The National Sunflower Association estimates the sunflower
harvest at over 95% complete across the country and 96% in North Dakota as of
Nov. 29th. The quality of this
season’s US crop is a tad better than the prior year as outlined in the below
table. For the Northern Plains region,
both oil content and test weight have improved year over year while moisture
content and foreign material have declined.
In mid-October, the USDA estimated the yield of the 2021
sunflower crop at 1,554 lbs/ac nationwide; which is not bad considering the
western third of the US along with the Dakota’s and Minnesota were all
experiencing some level of significant drought stress. The overall production of US sunflowers was
1.9 billion lbs. in 2021, or about 64% of the 2020 record production of almost
3.0 billion lbs. The primary factor
between the two years was 400k less acres planted across the nation in 2021 –
which is very significant in a crop that only generates 1.4 to 1.5 mil acres planted
per year for a historical average.
Ritchison
Weather Forecast for the 2022 Season
Daryl Ritchison, as the NDSU Director of NDAWN stations, provided
a thorough evaluation of his weather network and an outlook for the 2022 cropping
season. Below are his highlights from a
presentation to the Prairie Grains Conference in Grand Forks (Dec. 9, 2021).
· NDAWN’s
30 year normal did update on January 1st of 2021. The 30-year benchmark will be reflected within
NDAWN’s reports as the period between Jan 1st, 1991 through to Dec.
31st, 2020 – resulting in a cooler and wetter 30-year period then
the prior evaluation period of 1981-2010
· NDAWN’s
goal is to provide weather technology to offset ag production risk. Mr. Ritchison gave the following quote: “You
don’t get points for predicting rain, you get points for building arks.” – Lou Gerstner;
American businessman. For example, can we
use weather data predictions to outline farm activity – what upcoming 12-hour
period will be most beneficial for fungicide application for maximum effectiveness
against a certain pest?
· A
regional weather outlook pattern will be developing for the 2020 decade where
we’ll have 70% chance of below average precipitation during the decade (7 out
of 10 years) - Fargo & Grand Forks (70%); 80% chance in Bismarck; 75%
chance in the Twin Cities
· Therefore,
predictions for the 2022 growing season will be slightly drier than average for
the year and warmer than average overall (but not as warm as 2021 – which was a
very warm and long growing season)
· Good
to excess soil moisture to start the season
· Small
to moderate flooding (excess spring water in typical places)
· Below
average rain in July and August with warm to hot conditions
· Less
heat units in 2022 than 2021; no prediction on frost events or upcoming winter
snowfall
· An
interesting historical weather note – “Hot wind, leaves and shrubbery cooked” -
Fargo Forum headline from July 1936; Steele, ND after a 121F temperature day
and a good wind from the northwest (highest temperature ever recorded in North
Dakota).
Comments
Post a Comment