Jan. 20, 2022 Edition
“One time when I was playing poker, I thought I had a full
house. Turned out that I only had two
pair! Nobody let me off the hook; I still
had to pay for that mistake!” – North Dakota farm producer
We all make mistakes and yes, mistakes usually cost money at
the end of the day. However, it’s the
learning we get from making those mistakes that is the most valuable. It’s the winter season and even though we’ve
done the winter planning numerous times before, it’s always key to confirm
where our business is at and where it’s headed towards to minimize any mistakes
down the road (more on this below).
During the growing season, I usually let our regional
Pioneer customers drive most of the activity we converse about in this
newsletter, but as we get into the winter season, I try to find good topics to
help improve our businesses, improve crop productivity, and/or give a glimpse
into the future. Therefore, I’ll hit these
topics this month: winter planning, potassium fertilizer,
NCGA corn yield contest winners, and a broadacre technology update.
Winter
Planning
FarmWeekNow.com had a great article on the evaluation of a
farm business with a “health check-up”.
This list can look awful intimidating at first glance (https://bit.ly/FarmTest), but I’d guess many of you have several of
these items already accomplished. From
my understanding, it was developed as a template for all successful farms to
strive towards to make their business more robust and to measure an individual
farm’s performance against the leading farms of the country.
Some of our businesses are still fairly young and growing and thus
may have a lot of work to accomplish on this list, and other healthy mature
farms probably have most of these addressed.
Regardless of where your business is at, giving this list a review and
then getting some key partners in on the discussion should lead to a productive
business session.
https://www.farmweeknow.com/...new-year-great-time-for-farm-business-checkup...
It’s not every day that we read, hear or see something
relating to the next big ag technology in farming. Of course, there are always questions to the
validity of such claims and/or how long it will take for the technology to
become prevalent enough to be accepted as the next wave. However, this proposal has some merit and has
been in testing in eastern Europe (Ukraine) since at least 2019. I’m not going to take anything away from
autonomous machinery, but I think this “Nexat” technology should have some
significant short-term influence in our broad acre farms.
Basically, up until this point in history of raising
agricultural commodity crops, we’ve had the system of horsepower being
connected to an implement to accomplish the desired field level task. Yes, we’ve had self-propelled sprayers and
especially combines for a while now, but what if every pass in the field was
under a self-propelled interchangeable setup?
Meet the NEXAT:
·
Next-generation Agriculture Technology
·
14-meter (46 ft) wide power unit
·
Has several generators that are powered by two
independently controlled 550 horsepower engines
·
Functions with the ability to create a
self-propelled unit no matter the task – tillage, planting, spraying or
harvesting
·
Less physical weight than traditional equipment,
and thus less material is needed for attachments – improves cost effectiveness
·
More fuel efficient than tractors with
implements
·
Very even residue distribution demonstrated over
a 50 ft wide corn head (with 27.5” row spacing)
·
Over 1,000 bu harvest holding capacity that can
be emptied in under 60 seconds (17 bu/sec)
·
Easily utilized to maximize controlled traffic
farming – CTF (https://www.agric.wa.govv/...controlled-traffic-tramline-farming-system)
·
Working widths of 6 to 24 meter (20 to 79 ft) –
planting, tillage and harvesting
·
Maximum 70-meter (230 ft) boom width for spray
applications
·
Website: www.nexat.de and YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDyDPdf9Dyo
Supposedly, they will have a demo unit in North America this
upcoming summer. It will be interesting
to see where and what type of hype it garners.
Potassium
Fertility in North Dakota
Any region big or small is going to experience variability
across the area. Many of us don’t think
about these changes, but the changes are significant and can be exploited to
generate more financial opportunities. One
example in our ag businesses would be the benefit from different management
practices from one field or farm to another.
When it comes to soils and crop fertility, it’s these
variable differences from field to field or even within the same field that
really make the art of crop fertility a true challenge. Yeah, I guess a guy could just over fertilize
every acre and thus remove any type of potential fertilizer deficiency as a
crop limiting factor on every square foot of soil. However, I’m sure sooner or later the banker
would respond with some financial recommendations of his own.
When it comes to potassium fertility in corn, NDSU has done
some fantastic work in fine-tuning their recommendation based on soil clay
content. Basically, they evaluated those
soils higher in smectite clay require more exchangeable potassium. Soils with higher smectite clay content will
shrink and swell with the addition/subtraction of available soil moisture. Even though these soils may test high in
available potassium (over 150 ppm K), they more tightly hold potassium and thus
provide a positive crop response to the addition of potash fertilizer.
The NDSU soil science team has developed the following map
(illustration) and potassium calculator (weblink) for farm managers and crop
consultants to manage through the situation.
Basically, it states that if you farm soils in or near the dark shaded
area of North Dakota that are high to very high in clay content, then we should
more closely evaluate our potassium recommendations for corn and probably other
crops as well.
In a nutshell, you may consider added potash fertilizer for most all crops in these situations:
·
Crop yields that are habitually under-achieving
expectations
·
You have fields or significant zones within
fields of high to very high clay content that are prone to shrinking when very
dry (with deep soil cracks) and swelling when very wet
·
Soils that test under or around 200 ppm
potassium
Conversely, if you have sandy fields with low cation
exchange capacity (CEC), these soils should be closely monitored for potassium
as well. Low CEC soils testing under 150
ppm available K should have potash supplemented regularly since they will not
be able to hold potassium in the soil solution (prone to leaching potassium
when in excess).
https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/soils/corn_k/
https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/north-dakota-clay-mineralogy...
David Hula Does It Again!
Well, the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) has
announced their annual winners for state and national categories for the 2021
cropping season. This year’s overall top
yielding corn farmer in the U.S. is starting to create a status of legendary
fame. David Hula once again topped the
600 bu/ac mark with his national winning entry with Pioneer’s P1222YHR hybrid
(although not a record, see list below).
Mr. Hula has set the last three national corn yield records over the
past seven years and his 616 bu/ac performance from the 2019 growing season
still stands as the all-time corn yield record.
List of prior NCGA winners:
2014: Randy Dowdy – Georgia – 503
bu/ac – * set new record; first to exceed 500 bu/ac
2015: David Hula – Virginia – 534
bu/ac * set new record
2016: Randy Dowdy – Georgia – 521
bu/ac
2017: David Hula – Virginia – 542
bu/ac * set new record
2018: Don Stall – Michigan – 477
bu/ac
2019: David Hula – Virginia – 616
bu/ac * current record holder; first to exceed 600 bu/ac
2020: Don Stall – Michigan – 477
bu/ac
2021: David Hula – Virginia – 602 bu/ac
It was probably only 12-15 years ago that many industry-leading
corn breeders thought the genetic yield potential was about 500-600 bu/ac
maximum from any given hybrid. Leave it
to the American farmer to show ingenuity and determination to top even the
expert’s expectations!
For NCGA state winners in North Dakota and Minnesota, we have
the following:
·
Non-Irrigated MN: Chris Sobeck of Winona at 309
bu/ac under the no-till category with DKC60-80RIB
·
Irrigated MN: Fred Bauer of Hastings at 307
bu/ac (no-till) with P0720AM
·
Non-Irrigated ND: Betty Huber of Berlin at 299
bu/ac with DKC45-66RIB
·
Irrigated ND: John Hofer of Milnor at 289 bu/ac
with DKC50-08RIB
https://www.ncga.com/get-involved/national-corn-yield-contest
Congratulations to all the NCGA participants and winners for
the 2021 cropping season, and “Good Luck” in the upcoming 2022 season!
Comments
Post a Comment